Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

Car comparison chart

units: metric UK US

Add a car:

Morgan
Roadster
(2004)




Basic (general) data

remove
Marque (make)Image of Morgan Roadster
Morgan
SerieRoadster
Model family
ModelRoadster
Model code
Issued from2004
Issued until
Country of originUK
Number made
Body construction
Body designation

Bodywork

 
Base platform
Bodywork typeroadster
Bodywork designer
Number of doors2
Number of seats2
Cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Max. cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Passenger space (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]

Dimensions & Weight

 
Wheelbase [mm / in / in]2490 / 98.0 / 98.0
Track front [mm / in / in]1290 / 50.8 / 50.8
Track rear [mm / in / in]1440 / 56.7 / 56.7
Length [mm / in / in]4010 / 157.9 / 157.9
Width [mm / in / in]1720 / 67.7 / 67.7
Height [mm / in / in]1220 / 48.0 / 48.0
Length/wheelbase ratio1.61
Ground clearance [mm / in / in]150 / 5.9 / 5.9
Total (curb) weight [kg / lb / lb]940 / 2072 / 2072
Dry weight [kg / lb / lb]
Load capacity [kg / lb / lb]
Gross (max.) weight [kg / lb / lb]
Towing weight [kg / lb / lb]
Weight distribution (front) [% / % / %]
Fuel capacity [l / UK gal / US gal]

Aerodynamics

 
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)
Frontal area (A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]1.78 / 19.2 / 19.2 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]
Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph) [kW / hp / hp]

Engine

 
Engine Code
Engine ManufacturerFord
Engine TypeV engine
Engine Type Details
Sump
Fuelpetrol (gasoline)
Fuel details
Cam DesignDOHC (double overhead camshafts, twin cam)
Total number of cylinders6
Total number of valves24
Valves per cylinder4
Engine Main bearings
Engine construction
Bore [mm / in / in]89.0 / 3.50 / 3.50
Stroke [mm / in / in]79.5 / 3.13 / 3.13
Bore/Stroke ratio1.12
Engine displacement [cm3 / cu in / cu in]2967 / 181.1 / 181.1
Unitary capacity [cm3/cylinder / cu in/cylinder / cu in/cylinder]494.50 / 30.176 / 30.176
Compression ratio
Fuel supply
Aspirationnatural
Compressor typeN/A
Intercoolerno
Catalytic converteryes
Max. output power [kW / hp / hp]166.3 / 223.0 / 223.0
Max. output power rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]6150 / 6150 / 6150
Max. torque [N·m / lb·ft / lb·ft]280.0 / 206.5 / 206.5
Max. torque rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]4900 / 4900 / 4900
Maximum rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]
Coolantwater
Max. net output (power at the wheels) [kW / hp / hp]64.2 / 86.1 / 86.1 (est.)
Specific output [kW/l / bhp/cu in / bhp/cu in]56.0 / 1.232 / 1.232
Specific torque [N·m/l / lb·ft/cu in / lb·ft/cu in]94.4 / 0.83 / 0.83

Transmission

 
Transmission typemanual
Number of gears5
Wheel driverear wheel drive
Top gear (drive) ratio1
Final gear (drive) ratio3.08

Performance

 
Power-to-weight ratio [kW/ton / bhp/ton / bhp/ton]237.2 / 179.7 / 179.7
Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h) [s / s / s]5.40 / 5.40 / 5.40
Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h) [s / s / s]14.50 / 14.50 / 14.50
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile time [s / s / s]14.20 / 14.20 / 14.20
Standing ¼mile speed [km/h / mph / mph]99 / 62 / 62
Standing kilometer time [s / s / s]
Standing kilometer speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Top (maximal) speed [km/h / mph / mph]216 / 134 / 134
Fuel consumption, City (urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Mixed (combined) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Euro [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
CO2 emissions [g/km / g/mi / g/mi]232 / 373 / 373
Range [km / mi / mi]

Chassis

 
Engine locationfront
Engine alignmentlongitudinal
Steering
Steering details
Turns lock-to-lock
Suspension front
Suspension rear
Wheels front
Wheels rear
Tyres front205/55 ZR 16
Tyres rear205/55 ZR 16
Brakes front
Brakes rear
Brakes details
Brake diameter front [mm / in / in]
Brake diameter rear [mm / in / in]
Braked area [cm2 / sq in / sq in]
Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist