Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

e-knihy ke stažení
e-books for download
literatura, klasika
kniha ePub, PDF

Car comparison chart

units: metric UK US

Add a car:

Honda
Accord Aerodeck 2.0i LS 16V
(1993)




Basic (general) data

remove
Marque (make)Image of Honda Accord Aerodeck 2.0i LS 16V
Honda
SerieAccord
Model family
ModelAccord Aerodeck 2.0i LS 16V
Model code
Issued from1993
Issued until1998
Country of originJP,US,CA
Number made
Body constructionmonocoque
Body designationCE2

Bodywork

 
Base platformAccord V
Bodywork typestation wagon (estate, combi)
Bodywork designer
Number of doors5
Number of seats5
Cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Max. cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Passenger space (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]

Dimensions & Weight

 
Wheelbase [mm / in / in]2715 / 106.9 / 106.9
Track front [mm / in / in]1515 / 59.6 / 59.6
Track rear [mm / in / in]1500 / 59.1 / 59.1
Length [mm / in / in]4770 / 187.8 / 187.8
Width [mm / in / in]1780 / 70.1 / 70.1
Height [mm / in / in]1425 / 56.1 / 56.1
Length/wheelbase ratio1.7569060773481
Ground clearance [mm / in / in]
Total (curb) weight [kg / lb / lb]1365 / 3009 / 3009
Dry weight [kg / lb / lb]
Load capacity [kg / lb / lb]
Gross (max.) weight [kg / lb / lb]
Towing weight [kg / lb / lb]
Weight distribution (front) [% / % / %]
Fuel capacity [l / UK gal / US gal]

Aerodynamics

 
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)
Frontal area (A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]2.16 / 23.2 / 23.2 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]
Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph) [kW / hp / hp] 

Engine

 
Engine Code
Engine Manufacturer
Engine Typestraight (inline)
Engine Type Details
Sump
Fuelpetrol (gasoline)
Fuel details
Cam DesignSOHC (single overhead camshaft)
Total number of cylinders4
Total number of valves16
Valves per cylinder4
Engine Main bearings
Engine construction
Bore [mm / in / in]85.0 / 3.35 / 3.35
Stroke [mm / in / in]88.0 / 3.46 / 3.46
Bore/Stroke ratio0.96590909090909
Engine displacement [cm3 / cu in / cu in]1997 / 121.9 / 121.9
Unitary capacity [cm3/cylinder / cu in/cylinder / cu in/cylinder]499.36 / 30.473 / 30.473
Compression ratio9.5
Fuel supplyMultipoint Injection
Aspiration
Compressor type
Intercooler
Catalytic converter
Max. output power [kW / hp / hp]100.0 / 134.1 / 134.1
Max. output power rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]5600 / 5600 / 5600
Max. torque [N·m / lb·ft / lb·ft]184.0 / 135.7 / 135.7
Max. torque rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]4500 / 4500 / 4500
Maximum rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]
Coolant
Max. net output (power at the wheels) [kW / hp / hp]40.0 / 53.6 / 53.6 (est.)
Specific output [kW/l / bhp/cu in / bhp/cu in]50.1 / 1.101 / 1.101
Specific torque [N·m/l / lb·ft/cu in / lb·ft/cu in]92.1 / 0.81 / 0.81

Transmission

 
Transmission type
Number of gears
Wheel drive
Top gear (drive) ratio
Final gear (drive) ratio

Performance

 
Power-to-weight ratio [kW/ton / bhp/ton / bhp/ton]
Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top [s / s / s] 
Standing ¼mile time [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Standing kilometer time [s / s / s]
Standing kilometer speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Top (maximal) speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Fuel consumption, City (urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Mixed (combined) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Euro [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
CO2 emissions [g/km / g/mi / g/mi]
Range [km / mi / mi] 

Chassis

 
Engine locationfront
Engine alignmenttransverse
Steering
Steering details
Turns lock-to-lock
Suspension front
Suspension rear
Wheels front
Wheels rear
Tyres front195/60 R 15
Tyres rear195/60 R 15
Brakes frontventilated disc
Brakes reardisc
Brakes details
Brake diameter front [mm / in / in]
Brake diameter rear [mm / in / in]
Braked area [cm2 / sq in / sq in]
Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist