Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

e-knihy ke stažení
e-books for download
literatura, klasika
kniha ePub, PDF

Mitsubishi logo

Mitsubishi L-300 Comfortwagon

(1982 model)

Brief specs of 1982 Mitsubishi L-300 Comfortwagon

9-door 1-seater minivan (multi-purpose vehicle, MPV), petrol (gasoline) 4-cylinder 8-valve straight (inline) engine, SOHC (single overhead camshaft), 1997 cm3 / 121.9 cu in / 121.9 cu in, 73.8 kW / 99.0 hp / 99.0 hp @ 5500 rpm / 5500 rpm / 5500 rpm, 160.0 N·m / 118.0 lb·ft / 118.0 lb·ft @ 3000 rpm / 3000 rpm / 3000 rpm, manual 5-speed transmission, rear wheel drive, 145 km/h / 90 mph / 90 mph top speed

units: metric UK US

Basic (general) data

Marque (make)MitsubishiIssued from1982
ModelL-300 ComfortwagonIssued until
SerieL300Number made
Model familyBody construction
Model codeBody designation
ManufacturerMitsubishi GroupCountryJP,AU

Bodywork

Base platformNumber of doors9
Bodywork typeminivan (multi-purpose vehicle, MPV)Number of seats1
Bodywork designerCargo capacity (volume)
Passenger space (volume)Max. cargo capacity (volume)

Dimensions & Weight

Length3990 mm / 157.1 in / 157.1 inTotal (curb) weight1223 kg / 2696 lb / 2696 lb
Width1690 mm / 66.5 in / 66.5 inDry weight
Height1800 mm / 70.9 in / 70.9 inLoad capacity
Wheelbase2200 mm / 86.6 in / 86.6 inGross (max.) weight
Track front1440 mm / 56.7 in / 56.7 inTowing weight
Track rear1380 mm / 54.3 in / 54.3 inWeight distribution (front)
Ground clearance195 mm / 7.7 in / 7.7 inFuel capacity76 l / 16.7 UK gal / 20.1 US gal
Length/wheelbase ratio1.81  

Aerodynamics

Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)Frontal area (A)2.59 m2 / 27.8 sq ft / 27.8 sq ft (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A)Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph)

Engine

Engine CodeTotal number of cylinders4
Engine Typestraight (inline) Total number of valves8
Engine ManufacturerMitsubishiValves per cylinder2
Engine constructionBore85.0 mm / 3.35 in / 3.35 in
Fuelpetrol (gasoline)Stroke88.0 mm / 3.46 in / 3.46 in
Fuel detailsBore/Stroke ratio0.97
Fuel supplyEngine displacement1997 cm3 / 121.9 cu in / 121.9 cu in
Engine Main bearings5Unitary capacity499.25 cm3/cylinder / 30.466 cu in/cylinder / 30.466 cu in/cylinder
Cam DesignSOHC (single overhead camshaft)Compression ratio9.5 : 1
SumpMax. output power73.8 kW / 99.0 hp / 99.0 hp at 5500 rpm / 5500 rpm / 5500 rpm
AspirationnaturalMax. torque160.0 N·m / 118.0 lb·ft / 118.0 lb·ft at 3000 rpm / 3000 rpm / 3000 rpm
Compressor typeN/AMaximum rpm
IntercoolernoMax. net output (power at the wheels)27.3 kW / 36.6 hp / 36.6 hp (est.)
CoolantwaterSpecific output37.0 kW/l / 0.812 bhp/cu in / 0.812 bhp/cu in
Catalytic converternoSpecific torque80.1 N·m/l / 0.70 lb·ft/cu in / 0.70 lb·ft/cu in

Transmission

Transmission typemanualNumber of gears5
Wheel driverear wheel driveTop gear (drive) ratio0.83
  Final gear (drive) ratio4.14

Performance

Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h)9.80 s / 9.80 s / 9.80 sTop (maximal) speed145 km/h / 90 mph / 90 mph
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h)Power-to-weight ratio81.0 kW/ton / 61.3 bhp/ton / 61.3 bhp/ton
Acceleration 0-100 km/h15.10 s / 15.10 s / 15.10 sFuel consumption, City (urban)
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h)Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban)
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in topFuel consumption, Mixed (combined)
Standing ¼mile time Fuel consumption, Euro
Standing kilometer time CO2 emissions
  Range

Chassis

Engine locationfrontEngine alignmentlongitudinal
Steeringrecirculating ballSteering details
Turns lock-to-lockTurning circle
Suspension frontIndependent, Wishbone (A-arm, control arm), Coil springs, Anti-roll (anti-sway) bar (ARB)Suspension rearLive axle, Leaf spring, Anti-roll (anti-sway) bar (ARB)
Wheels frontWheels rear
Tyres frontTyres rear
Brakes frontdiscBrakes reardrum
Brake diameter frontBrake diameter rear
Brakes detailsservo-assistedBraked area

Technical specifications and performance data of Mitsubishi L-300 Comfortwagon

Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist