Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

Car comparison chart

units: metric UK US

Add a car:

Toyota
2000 GT MF 10
(1971)




Basic (general) data

remove
Marque (make)Image of Toyota 2000 GT MF 10
Toyota
Serie2000
Model family
Model2000 GT MF 10
Model code
Issued from1971
Issued until
Country of originJP
Number made
Body construction
Body designation

Bodywork

 
Base platform
Bodywork type
Bodywork designer
Number of doors2
Number of seats2
Cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Max. cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Passenger space (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]3750 / 132.43 / 132.43

Dimensions & Weight

 
Wheelbase [mm / in / in]2510 / 98.8 / 98.8
Track front [mm / in / in]
Track rear [mm / in / in]
Length [mm / in / in]4180 / 164.6 / 164.6
Width [mm / in / in]1610 / 63.4 / 63.4
Height [mm / in / in]1170 / 46.1 / 46.1
Length/wheelbase ratio1.67
Ground clearance [mm / in / in]150 / 5.9 / 5.9
Total (curb) weight [kg / lb / lb]1160 / 2557 / 2557
Dry weight [kg / lb / lb]
Load capacity [kg / lb / lb]
Gross (max.) weight [kg / lb / lb]
Towing weight [kg / lb / lb]
Weight distribution (front) [% / % / %]
Fuel capacity [l / UK gal / US gal]60 / 13.2 / 15.9

Aerodynamics

 
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)
Frontal area (A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]1.60 / 17.2 / 17.2 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]
Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph) [kW / hp / hp]

Engine

 
Engine Code
Engine Manufacturer
Engine Typestraight (inline)
Engine Type DetailsInline, 6 cylinder
Sumpwet
Fuelpetrol (gasoline)
Fuel details
Cam Design
Total number of cylinders6
Total number of valves
Valves per cylinder
Engine Main bearings
Engine construction
Bore [mm / in / in]75.0 / 2.95 / 2.95
Stroke [mm / in / in]75.0 / 2.95 / 2.95
Bore/Stroke ratio1
Engine displacement [cm3 / cu in / cu in]1988 / 121.3 / 121.3
Unitary capacity [cm3/cylinder / cu in/cylinder / cu in/cylinder]331.34 / 20.220 / 20.220
Compression ratio
Fuel supplyCarburettor
Aspirationnatural
Compressor type
Intercooler
Catalytic converter
Max. output power [kW / hp / hp]95.0 / 127.4 / 127.4
Max. output power rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]6600 / 6600 / 6600
Max. torque [N·m / lb·ft / lb·ft]180.0 / 132.8 / 132.8
Max. torque rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]5000 / 5000 / 5000
Maximum rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]
Coolant
Max. net output (power at the wheels) [kW / hp / hp]47.9 / 64.3 / 64.3 (est.)
Specific output [kW/l / bhp/cu in / bhp/cu in]47.8 / 1.050 / 1.050
Specific torque [N·m/l / lb·ft/cu in / lb·ft/cu in]90.5 / 0.79 / 0.79

Transmission

 
Transmission type
Number of gears
Wheel driverear wheel drive
Top gear (drive) ratio
Final gear (drive) ratio

Performance

 
Power-to-weight ratio [kW/ton / bhp/ton / bhp/ton]111.2 / 84.3 / 84.3
Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h) [s / s / s]8.70 / 8.70 / 8.70
Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile time [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Standing kilometer time [s / s / s]
Standing kilometer speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Top (maximal) speed [km/h / mph / mph]220 / 137 / 137
Fuel consumption, City (urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Mixed (combined) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Euro [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
CO2 emissions [g/km / g/mi / g/mi]
Range [km / mi / mi]

Chassis

 
Engine locationfront
Engine alignmentlongitudinal
Steering
Steering details
Turns lock-to-lock
Suspension front
Suspension rear
Wheels front
Wheels rear
Tyres front215/45-ZR17
Tyres rear215/60-R16
Brakes frontdisc
Brakes reardisc
Brakes detailsABS (anti-lock braking system)
Brake diameter front [mm / in / in]
Brake diameter rear [mm / in / in]
Braked area [cm2 / sq in / sq in]
Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist