Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

 

forDSLR.com - manuals and accessories for DSLR cameras

e-knihy ke stažení
e-books for download
literatura, klasika
kniha ePub, PDF

Car comparison chart

units: metric UK US

Add a car:

Austin
A60 Cambridge
(1962)



 

Basic (general) data

remove
Marque (make)Image of Austin A60 Cambridge
Austin
SerieA60
Model family
ModelA60 Cambridge
Model code
Issued from1962
Issued until
Country of originUK
Number made
Body construction
Body designation

Bodywork

 
Base platform
Bodywork typesedan (saloon)
Bodywork designer
Number of doors3
Number of seats5
Cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Max. cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Passenger space (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]4110 / 145.14 / 145.14

Dimensions & Weight

 
Wheelbase [mm / in / in]2550 / 100.4 / 100.4
Track front [mm / in / in]
Track rear [mm / in / in]
Length [mm / in / in]4440 / 174.8 / 174.8
Width [mm / in / in]1620 / 63.8 / 63.8
Height [mm / in / in]1530 / 60.2 / 60.2
Length/wheelbase ratio1.74
Ground clearance [mm / in / in]160 / 6.3 / 6.3
Total (curb) weight [kg / lb / lb]1120 / 2469 / 2469
Dry weight [kg / lb / lb]
Load capacity [kg / lb / lb]
Gross (max.) weight [kg / lb / lb]
Towing weight [kg / lb / lb]
Weight distribution (front) [% / % / %]
Fuel capacity [l / UK gal / US gal]34 / 7.5 / 9.0

Aerodynamics

 
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)0.5
Frontal area (A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]2.11 / 22.7 / 22.7 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]1.05 / 11.3 / 11.3 (est.)
Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph) [kW / hp / hp]26.2 / 35.1 / 35.1 (est.)

Engine

 
Engine Code
Engine Manufacturer
Engine Typestraight (inline)
Engine Type DetailsInline, 4 cylinder
Sumpwet
Fuelpetrol (gasoline)
Fuel details
Cam Design
Total number of cylinders4
Total number of valves8
Valves per cylinder2
Engine Main bearings
Engine construction
Bore [mm / in / in]76.2 / 3.00 / 3.00
Stroke [mm / in / in]88.9 / 3.50 / 3.50
Bore/Stroke ratio0.86
Engine displacement [cm3 / cu in / cu in]1622 / 99.0 / 99.0
Unitary capacity [cm3/cylinder / cu in/cylinder / cu in/cylinder]405.42 / 24.740 / 24.740
Compression ratio8.3
Fuel supplyCarburettor
Aspirationnatural
Compressor type
Intercooler
Catalytic converter
Max. output power [kW / hp / hp]45.0 / 60.3 / 60.3
Max. output power rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]4500 / 4500 / 4500
Max. torque [N·m / lb·ft / lb·ft]122.0 / 90.0 / 90.0
Max. torque rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]2500 / 2500 / 2500
Maximum rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]
Coolantwater
Max. net output (power at the wheels) [kW / hp / hp]18.0 / 24.1 / 24.1 (est.)
Specific output [kW/l / bhp/cu in / bhp/cu in]27.7 / 0.610 / 0.610
Specific torque [N·m/l / lb·ft/cu in / lb·ft/cu in]75.2 / 0.66 / 0.66

Transmission

 
Transmission type
Number of gears
Wheel driverear wheel drive
Top gear (drive) ratio
Final gear (drive) ratio

Performance

 
Power-to-weight ratio [kW/ton / bhp/ton / bhp/ton]55.4 / 42.0 / 42.0
Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top [s / s / s] 
Standing ¼mile time [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Standing kilometer time [s / s / s]
Standing kilometer speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Top (maximal) speed [km/h / mph / mph]129 / 80 / 80
Fuel consumption, City (urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Mixed (combined) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Euro [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
CO2 emissions [g/km / g/mi / g/mi]
Range [km / mi / mi] 

Chassis

 
Engine locationfront
Engine alignmentlongitudinal
Steering
Steering details
Turns lock-to-lock
Suspension front
Suspension rear
Wheels front
Wheels rear
Tyres front3.0x26
Tyres rear3.0x26
Brakes frontdrum
Brakes reardrum
Brakes details
Brake diameter front [mm / in / in]
Brake diameter rear [mm / in / in]
Braked area [cm2 / sq in / sq in]
Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist