Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

e-knihy ke stažení
e-books for download
literatura, klasika
kniha ePub, PDF

Car comparison chart

units: metric UK US

Add a car:

Allard
GT
(1957)



 

Basic (general) data

 remove
Marque (make)Image of Allard GT
Allard
SerieGT
Model family
ModelGT
Model code
Issued from1957
Issued until
Country of originUK
Number made
Body construction
Body designation

Bodywork

 
Base platform
Bodywork typecoupé
Bodywork designer
Number of doors2
Number of seats2
Cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Max. cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Passenger space (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]

Dimensions & Weight

 
Wheelbase [mm / in / in]2440 / 96.1 / 96.1
Track front [mm / in / in]
Track rear [mm / in / in]
Length [mm / in / in]4120 / 162.2 / 162.2
Width [mm / in / in]1610 / 63.4 / 63.4
Height [mm / in / in]1380 / 54.3 / 54.3
Length/wheelbase ratio1.69
Ground clearance [mm / in / in]160 / 6.3 / 6.3
Total (curb) weight [kg / lb / lb]1140 / 2513 / 2513
Dry weight [kg / lb / lb]
Load capacity [kg / lb / lb]
Gross (max.) weight [kg / lb / lb]
Towing weight [kg / lb / lb]
Weight distribution (front) [% / % / %]
Fuel capacity [l / UK gal / US gal]90 / 19.8 / 23.8

Aerodynamics

 
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)
Frontal area (A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]1.89 / 20.3 / 20.3 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]
Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph) [kW / hp / hp] 

Engine

 
Engine Code
Engine Manufacturer
Engine Typestraight (inline)
Engine Type DetailsInline, 6 cylinder
Sump
Fuel
Fuel details
Cam Design
Total number of cylinders6
Total number of valves
Valves per cylinder
Engine Main bearings
Engine construction
Bore [mm / in / in]83.0 / 3.27 / 3.27
Stroke [mm / in / in]106.0 / 4.17 / 4.17
Bore/Stroke ratio0.78
Engine displacement [cm3 / cu in / cu in]3442 / 210.0 / 210.0
Unitary capacity [cm3/cylinder / cu in/cylinder / cu in/cylinder]573.52 / 34.998 / 34.998
Compression ratio8.0
Fuel supplyCarburettor
Aspirationnatural
Compressor type
Intercooler
Catalytic converter
Max. output power [kW / hp / hp]157.0 / 210.5 / 210.5
Max. output power rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]5750 / 5750 / 5750
Max. torque [N·m / lb·ft / lb·ft]289.0 / 213.2 / 213.2
Max. torque rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]4000 / 4000 / 4000
Maximum rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]
Coolantwater
Max. net output (power at the wheels) [kW / hp / hp]41.8 / 56.0 / 56.0 (est.)
Specific output [kW/l / bhp/cu in / bhp/cu in]45.6 / 1.002 / 1.002
Specific torque [N·m/l / lb·ft/cu in / lb·ft/cu in]84.0 / 0.73 / 0.73

Transmission

 
Transmission typemanual
Number of gears4
Wheel driverear wheel drive
Top gear (drive) ratio
Final gear (drive) ratio

Performance

 
Power-to-weight ratio [kW/ton / bhp/ton / bhp/ton]186.8 / 141.5 / 141.5
Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h) [s / s / s]7.40 / 7.40 / 7.40
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h) [s / s / s]9.60 / 9.60 / 9.60
Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top [s / s / s] 
Standing ¼mile time [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Standing kilometer time [s / s / s]
Standing kilometer speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Top (maximal) speed [km/h / mph / mph]193 / 120 / 120
Fuel consumption, City (urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Mixed (combined) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Euro [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
CO2 emissions [g/km / g/mi / g/mi]
Range [km / mi / mi] 

Chassis

 
Engine locationfront
Engine alignmentlongitudinal
Steering
Steering details
Turns lock-to-lock
Suspension front
Suspension rear
Wheels front
Wheels rear
Tyres front
Tyres rear
Brakes frontdrum
Brakes reardrum
Brakes details
Brake diameter front [mm / in / in]
Brake diameter rear [mm / in / in]
Braked area [cm2 / sq in / sq in]
Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist