Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

e-knihy ke stažení
e-books for download
literatura, klasika
kniha ePub, PDF

Car comparison chart

units: metric UK US

Add a car:

HRG
1500
(1953)



 

Basic (general) data

 remove
Marque (make)Image of HRG 1500
HRG
Serie1500
Model family
Model1500
Model code
Issued from1953
Issued until
Country of originUK
Number made
Body construction
Body designation

Bodywork

 
Base platform
Bodywork typeroadster
Bodywork designer
Number of doors2
Number of seats2
Cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Max. cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Passenger space (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]

Dimensions & Weight

 
Wheelbase [mm / in / in]2616 / 103.0 / 103.0
Track front [mm / in / in]1219 / 48.0 / 48.0
Track rear [mm / in / in]1143 / 45.0 / 45.0
Length [mm / in / in]3658 / 144.0 / 144.0
Width [mm / in / in]1397 / 55.0 / 55.0
Height [mm / in / in]1270 / 50.0 / 50.0
Length/wheelbase ratio1.4
Ground clearance [mm / in / in]
Total (curb) weight [kg / lb / lb]737 / 1625 / 1625
Dry weight [kg / lb / lb]
Load capacity [kg / lb / lb]
Gross (max.) weight [kg / lb / lb]
Towing weight [kg / lb / lb]
Weight distribution (front) [% / % / %]
Fuel capacity [l / UK gal / US gal]

Aerodynamics

 
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)
Frontal area (A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]1.51 / 16.2 / 16.2 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]
Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph) [kW / hp / hp] 

Engine

 
Engine Code
Engine ManufacturerSinger
Engine Typestraight (inline)
Engine Type Details
Sump
Fuelpetrol (gasoline)
Fuel details
Cam DesignSOHC (single overhead camshaft)
Total number of cylinders4
Total number of valves8
Valves per cylinder2
Engine Main bearings
Engine construction
Bore [mm / in / in]73.0 / 2.87 / 2.87
Stroke [mm / in / in]89.4 / 3.52 / 3.52
Bore/Stroke ratio0.82
Engine displacement [cm3 / cu in / cu in]1497 / 91.4 / 91.4
Unitary capacity [cm3/cylinder / cu in/cylinder / cu in/cylinder]374.25 / 22.838 / 22.838
Compression ratio8.0
Fuel supply2 SU carbs
Aspirationnatural
Compressor typeN/A
Intercoolerno
Catalytic converterno
Max. output power [kW / hp / hp]46.2 / 62.0 / 62.0
Max. output power rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]4800 / 4800 / 4800
Max. torque [N·m / lb·ft / lb·ft]90.0 / 66.4 / 66.4
Max. torque rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]3000 / 3000 / 3000
Maximum rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]
Coolantwater
Max. net output (power at the wheels) [kW / hp / hp]18.5 / 24.8 / 24.8 (est.)
Specific output [kW/l / bhp/cu in / bhp/cu in]30.9 / 0.678 / 0.678
Specific torque [N·m/l / lb·ft/cu in / lb·ft/cu in]60.1 / 0.53 / 0.53

Transmission

 
Transmission typemanual
Number of gears4
Wheel driverear wheel drive
Top gear (drive) ratio1
Final gear (drive) ratio4.1

Performance

 
Power-to-weight ratio [kW/ton / bhp/ton / bhp/ton]84.1 / 63.7 / 63.7
Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top [s / s / s] 
Standing ¼mile time [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Standing kilometer time [s / s / s]
Standing kilometer speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Top (maximal) speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Fuel consumption, City (urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Mixed (combined) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Euro [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
CO2 emissions [g/km / g/mi / g/mi]
Range [km / mi / mi] 

Chassis

 
Engine locationfront
Engine alignmentlongitudinal
Steeringworm
Steering details
Turns lock-to-lock
Suspension frontIndependent, Transverse leaf spring
Suspension rearIndependent, Transverse leaf spring
Wheels front
Wheels rear
Tyres front
Tyres rear
Brakes front
Brakes rear
Brakes details
Brake diameter front [mm / in / in]
Brake diameter rear [mm / in / in]
Braked area [cm2 / sq in / sq in]
Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist