Car quick pick



My car fleet

No cars selected

e-knihy ke stažení
e-books for download
literatura, klasika
kniha ePub, PDF

Car comparison chart

units: metric UK US

Add a car:

Puma
GT
(1968)



 

Basic (general) data

 remove
Marque (make)Image of Puma GT
Puma
SerieGT
Model family
ModelGT
Model code
Issued from1968
Issued until
Country of originBR
Number made
Body construction
Body designation

Bodywork

 
Base platform
Bodywork typefixed-head coupé
Bodywork designer
Number of doors2
Number of seats2
Cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Max. cargo capacity (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]
Passenger space (volume) [l / cu ft / cu ft]

Dimensions & Weight

 
Wheelbase [mm / in / in]2220 / 87.4 / 87.4
Track front [mm / in / in]1290 / 50.8 / 50.8
Track rear [mm / in / in]1350 / 53.1 / 53.1
Length [mm / in / in]3850 / 151.6 / 151.6
Width [mm / in / in]1600 / 63.0 / 63.0
Height [mm / in / in]1200 / 47.2 / 47.2
Length/wheelbase ratio1.73
Ground clearance [mm / in / in]
Total (curb) weight [kg / lb / lb]800 / 1764 / 1764
Dry weight [kg / lb / lb]
Load capacity [kg / lb / lb]
Gross (max.) weight [kg / lb / lb]
Towing weight [kg / lb / lb]
Weight distribution (front) [% / % / %]
Fuel capacity [l / UK gal / US gal]65 / 14.3 / 17.2

Aerodynamics

 
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw)
Frontal area (A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]1.63 / 17.6 / 17.6 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) [m2 / sq ft / sq ft]
Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph) [kW / hp / hp] 

Engine

 
Engine Code
Engine ManufacturerAuto Union
Engine Typestraight (inline)
Engine Type Details
Sump
Fuelpetrol (gasoline)
Fuel details
Cam Design
Total number of cylinders3
Total number of valves
Valves per cylinder
Engine Main bearings
Engine construction
Bore [mm / in / in]74.0 / 2.91 / 2.91
Stroke [mm / in / in]76.0 / 2.99 / 2.99
Bore/Stroke ratio0.97
Engine displacement [cm3 / cu in / cu in]981 / 59.9 / 59.9
Unitary capacity [cm3/cylinder / cu in/cylinder / cu in/cylinder]327.00 / 19.955 / 19.955
Compression ratio8.0
Fuel supply
Aspirationnatural
Compressor typeN/A
Intercoolerno
Catalytic converterno
Max. output power [kW / hp / hp]44.0 / 59.0 / 59.0
Max. output power rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]4500 / 4500 / 4500
Max. torque [N·m / lb·ft / lb·ft]88.0 / 64.9 / 64.9
Max. torque rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]2500 / 2500 / 2500
Maximum rpm [rpm / rpm / rpm]
Coolantair
Max. net output (power at the wheels) [kW / hp / hp]17.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 (est.)
Specific output [kW/l / bhp/cu in / bhp/cu in]44.9 / 0.986 / 0.986
Specific torque [N·m/l / lb·ft/cu in / lb·ft/cu in]89.7 / 0.78 / 0.78

Transmission

 
Transmission typemanual
Number of gears4
Wheel drivefront wheel drive
Top gear (drive) ratio
Final gear (drive) ratio

Performance

 
Power-to-weight ratio [kW/ton / bhp/ton / bhp/ton]73.8 / 55.9 / 55.9
Acceleration 0-50 mph (80 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-60 mph (97 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s / s / s]
Acceleration 0-100 mph (160 km/h) [s / s / s]
Acceleration 80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top [s / s / s] 
Standing ¼mile time [s / s / s]
Standing ¼mile speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Standing kilometer time [s / s / s]
Standing kilometer speed [km/h / mph / mph]
Top (maximal) speed [km/h / mph / mph]170 / 106 / 106
Fuel consumption, City (urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Road (extra-urban) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Mixed (combined) [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
Fuel consumption, Euro [l/100km / mpg-UK / mpg-US]
CO2 emissions [g/km / g/mi / g/mi]
Range [km / mi / mi] 

Chassis

 
Engine locationfront
Engine alignmentlongitudinal
Steeringrack & pinion
Steering details
Turns lock-to-lock
Suspension frontIndependent, Transverse leaf spring
Suspension rear
Wheels front
Wheels rear
Tyres front560-15
Tyres rear560-15
Brakes frontdisc
Brakes reardrum
Brakes details
Brake diameter front [mm / in / in]
Brake diameter rear [mm / in / in]
Braked area [cm2 / sq in / sq in]
Infobox

Top U.S. Insurance Companies

The top auto insurance companies in the U.S.A., based on several customer and expert ratings, are in the following list. Although individual ratings vary slightly, the order of the insurance companies below approximately reflects their average quality:

 
TOPlist